Atayyar Legal Company

Peer-Reviewed Legal Research

Grounds for Setting Aside an Arbitral Award under the Saudi Arbitration LawAn Applied Study in Comparison with Islamic Jurisprudence

Research by Dr. Turki bin Abdullah bin Aqeel Al‑Tayyar analysing Article 50 grounds, Saudi judicial applications and practical errors that may expose an arbitral award to annulment.

AuthorDr. Turki bin Abdullah bin Aqeel Al‑Tayyar
Published inJournal of Arab Studies, Faculty of Dar Al Uloom, Minia University
SubjectGrounds for setting aside arbitral awards and Saudi judicial applications
MethodologyApplied, inductive, analytical and comparative
Research overview

Why Can an Arbitral Award Be Set Aside?

Atyar Advocates & Legal Consultants presents this peer-reviewed study by Dr. Turki Al‑Tayyar. The published English paper uses “annulment” and “nullity”; this page uses the conventional arbitration-law expression “setting aside” without changing the substance of the research.

Arbitration is intended to resolve disputes efficiently, but an award may be set aside where the arbitration agreement, constitution of the tribunal, proceedings or award is affected by a statutory ground. The consequences may include lost time and cost and the commencement of a new dispute.

Key point: a setting-aside action is not an ordinary appeal on the merits. It addresses defined statutory and procedural grounds. The study shows that understanding the judicial interpretation of these grounds and complying with procedural requirements are central to protecting an award.

The paper centres on Article 50 of the Saudi Arbitration Law and compares legal commentary and Saudi judicial applications with relevant principles of Islamic jurisprudence.

This page is an academic summary and does not constitute legal advice. Whether a ground exists depends on the arbitration agreement, procedural record, award and rules applicable to the particular case.
Scope of the study

Six Principal Categories of Setting-Aside Grounds

1

Arbitration agreement

Absence, invalidity or expiry of the agreement, or incapacity of a party when it was concluded.

2

Arbitral tribunal

Improper constitution of the tribunal, irregular appointment or issues affecting the tribunal’s authority.

3

Arbitral procedure

Defective notice, inability to present a defence or material departure from the agreed procedure.

4

Issuance of the award

Reasoning, signature, required information, timing and other formal requirements of the award.

5

Sharia and public policy

Conflict with non-derogable principles of Islamic Sharia or public policy in Saudi Arabia.

6

Scope and arbitrability

Exceeding the parties’ agreement or deciding matters that are outside the dispute or not capable of arbitration.

Research questions

Questions Connecting Statutory Text and Judicial Practice

Which practical errors by arbitral tribunals have resulted in awards being set aside?
May a court remit an award to the tribunal for correction, or must it immediately set it aside?
Why do tribunals sometimes contravene publicly available statutory provisions?
How can the number of judicial decisions setting aside awards be reduced?
May a party harmed by the setting aside of an award claim compensation?
How can interpretation of the statutory grounds be made more consistent?
Applied methodology

From Statutory Provision to Judicial Decision

Article 50 analysis

The research examines the grounds expressly stated in the Law and additional interpretations considered reasoned by legal commentators.

Islamic jurisprudence

It considers the legitimacy and limits of judicial review of arbitral awards through relevant jurisprudential principles.

Saudi case applications

Judicial decisions are used to demonstrate how grounds are interpreted and how practical errors affect awards.

Practical risks

Errors That May Jeopardise an Arbitral Award

1

Exceeding the scope of consent

Deciding claims or matters outside the arbitration agreement may expose all or a separable part of the award to annulment.

2

Irregular tribunal constitution

Failure to follow appointment rules or to respond correctly to an arbitrator’s withdrawal may affect validity.

3

Denial of due process

Defective notice or preventing a party from presenting its case may constitute a material setting-aside ground.

4

Defects in the award

Reasoning, signature or omission of essential information may affect validity depending on the nature and effect of the defect.

Key findings

What Did the Research Conclude?

01

Divergent understanding

Differences between some tribunals and courts in understanding the Arbitration Law are a principal cause of awards being set aside.

02

Procedural focus

Judicial applications focus more heavily on procedural and formal aspects than on reconsidering the substantive merits.

03

A defined action and period

Grounds must be raised through the prescribed setting-aside action within the statutory period and according to applicable procedure.

04

Interpretive and practical errors

Risk may arise from misunderstanding statutory text, disregarding accepted interpretations or mishandling an arbitrator’s withdrawal.

05

Case law as prevention

Studying judicial decisions and legal principles can help tribunals and practitioners avoid recurring grounds.

06

Potential compensation

The study finds that some decisions setting aside awards may lead to compensation for a party harmed by the arbitration.

Recommendations

Stronger Protection for Arbitral Awards

  • Issue a code of professional conduct for arbitrators addressing ethical standards and mandatory rules of practice.
  • Add the effects of setting aside to the Arbitration Law, including fees, past and future expenses, and the route for commencing new proceedings.
  • Identify recurring factual cases and develop Supreme Court principles that unify interpretation of the grounds.
  • Issue an explanatory regulation clarifying the Arbitration Law and reducing inconsistent judicial and arbitral interpretation.
Dr. Turki Al-Tayyar
About the author

Dr. Turki Al‑Tayyar

Dr. Turki Al‑Tayyar is a Saudi legal scholar and Associate Professor in the Department of Sharia Policy at the Higher Institute of Judiciary, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University in Riyadh. He is also the founder of Atyar Advocates & Legal Consultants.

His research combines Islamic legal foundations, statutory analysis and judicial practice, with particular attention to arbitration, award enforcement, mediation and dispute resolution.

ArbitrationSetting AsideIslamic Jurisprudence & LawJudicial StudiesDispute Resolution
View Dr. Turki Al‑Tayyar’s Profile

Download the Complete Research Paper

Read the complete study of the grounds for setting aside arbitral awards under Saudi law, its judicial applications and comparison with Islamic jurisprudence.

Read & Download the PDF ↓The paper opens in a new tab and can be saved to your device.
Frequently asked questions

Setting Aside Arbitral Awards in Saudi Arabia

What does setting aside an arbitral award mean?
It is a decision by the competent court declining to recognise all or a separable part of an arbitral award because a statutory ground has been established.
Is a setting-aside action an appeal on the merits?
No. It is a special statutory remedy directed to defined grounds and does not ordinarily involve rehearing the merits as an appeal.
What are the main categories of grounds?
They concern the arbitration agreement, tribunal, procedure, issuance of the award, Sharia or public policy, and the scope or arbitrability of the dispute.
Does every procedural error invalidate an award?
Not necessarily. The outcome depends on the governing provision, the nature of the irregularity and its effect on the award and parties’ rights.
Can only part of an award be set aside?
A court may set aside a separable part affected by a ground while preserving unaffected portions, depending on the circumstances.
Where can the English paper be downloaded?
Use any PDF button at the top, in the overview or near the end of the page to open and download the English paper.

جاهز لحماية حقوقك أو تطوير أعمالك؟

تواصل معنا اليوم واحصل على استشارة قانونية موثوقة

سواء كنت فردًا تبحث عن تمثيل قانوني موثوق أو شركة تحتاج إلى دعم قانوني متخصص، نحن في شركة أطيار للمحاماة والاستشارات القانونية جاهزون لمساعدتك. دعنا نكون شريكك القانوني في كل خطوة، بخبرة تتجاوز 23 عامًا في الأنظمة السعودية.

شركة الطيار للمحاماة والاستشارات القانونية

بيانات الاتصال

مجالات الممارسة

القانون التجاري والشركات

صياغة العقود والوثائق القانونية

القانون المالي والمصرفي

الضرائب والزكاة والجمارك

العقارات والملكية الخاصة

تابعنا

النشرة الإخبارية

You have been successfully Subscribed! Ops! Something went wrong, please try again.

© 2025 All Right Reserved Al Tayyar Leagal company