Case Study

Commercial Arbitration in a Sewerage and Infrastructure Project Dispute in Arar Under a Contract Exceeding SAR 12 Million

Dispute Value

SAR 12,000,000

The arbitration dispute arose from a contract for sewerage network and infrastructure works in Arar, with a contract value exceeding SAR 12 million and claims exceeding SAR 2.5 million.The dispute involved payment entitlements, financial compensation, and technical observations relating to project execution. A multi-member arbitral tribunal was constituted, with Prof. Dr. Turki Al-Tayyar, Founder of Atyar Advocates and Legal Consultants, appointed as a tribunal member pursuant to a judgment issued by the competent Commercial Court of Appeal in Riyadh.The proceedings lasted approximately one year and concluded with an arbitral award resolving the dispute. The award was subsequently upheld by the Commercial Court of Appeal and ordered for enforcement.

Case at a Glance

Nature of the Dispute

Sewerage and infrastructure construction

Contract Value

More than SAR 12 million

Claim Value

More than SAR 2.5 million

Type of Arbitration

Multi-member arbitral tribunal

Duration

Approximately one year

Outcome

Arbitral award upheld and ordered to be enforced

Background of the Dispute

The dispute arose under a contract for sewerage network and infrastructure works in Arar as part of a government-related water sector project.It concerned outstanding payment entitlements, financial compensation, and technical observations raised by the project owner, requiring an assessment of their impact on the works and the parties’ respective claims. Both parties submitted documents and evidence supporting their positions.Pursuant to a judgment issued by the competent Commercial Court of Appeal in Riyadh, Prof. Dr. Turki Al-Tayyar was appointed as a member of the arbitral tribunal. The proceedings concluded with an arbitral award resolving the dispute, which was subsequently upheld and ordered for enforcement by the Court of Appeal.

Type of Contract

Infrastructure Contract

Project Location

Arar

Nature of Claims

Payments & Compensation

Key Complexity

Technical Issues

Nature of the Arbitration and Sewerage Project Dispute

The matter concerned an arbitration arising from a contract for sewerage network and infrastructure works, involving claims for payment entitlements and compensation and technical observations raised by the project owner.

The arbitral proceedings required review of the contract, project execution records, technical observations, financial claims, and the parties’ evidence and submissions.

Reviewing the construction contract.
Analysing the sewerage network scope.
Reviewing the infrastructure works.
Reviewing the infrastructure works.
Reviewing the project owner’s technical observations.
Assessing the effect of those observations on entitlement.

Analysing payment claims.
Reviewing compensation claims.
Evaluating the parties’ evidence.
Considering written submissions and defences.
Participating in tribunal deliberations.
Participating in tribunal deliberations.

Essential Elements of the Dispute

Construction Contract

Determining the contractual obligations governing the sewerage and infrastructure works.

Works Performed

Assessing the scope of completed works and the records supporting their execution.

Project Owner’s Observations

Payment Entitlements

Analysing amounts claimed in respect of completed works.

Compensation Claims

Reviewing the contractual and financial basis for the compensation sought.

Evidentiary Record

Weighing the documents and evidence submitted by both parties.

Key Legal Challenges

Technical Observations on the Project

The project owner’s observations affected the assessment of performance and the parties’ financial claims.

Infrastructure Project Complexity

The technical nature of sewerage network works added an engineering dimension to the contractual dispute.

Competing Evidence

Both parties relied on documentary evidence supporting their respective positions regarding performance and entitlement.

Distinguishing Entitlements from Compensation

The tribunal had to distinguish amounts claimed for completed works from separate compensation claims.

Assessing the Effect of Technical Observations

It was necessary to determine whether the observations affected the existence or amount of the claimed entitlement.

Producing an Enforceable Award

The claims had to be addressed clearly and procedurally properly so that the award could withstand judicial review and proceed to enforcement.

Our Arbitration Approach

Analysing the Contract and Project Scope

The contractual obligations relating to sewerage and infrastructure works were identified before the claims were assessed.

Reviewing the Technical Observations

The project owner’s observations were examined and linked to the specific works in dispute.

Separating Payment and Compensation Claims

Each category of claim was analysed independently according to its contractual and evidentiary basis.

Weighing the Evidence

The documents submitted by both parties were assessed according to their direct connection with project execution and entitlement.

Linking Claims to Actual Performance

The financial claims were reviewed against the works performed and the supporting project records.

Reaching an Enforceable Determination

The tribunal addressed the issues through to an arbitral award that was subsequently upheld and ordered to be enforced.

Arbitration Services Provided

Participation in the Arbitral Tribunal

Serving as a member of a tribunal constituted pursuant to a judicial appointment.

Contract Review

Analysing the construction obligations relating to sewerage and infrastructure works.

Review of Technical Documentation

Considering project records and technical observations raised by the project owner.

Financial Claims Assessment

Analysing payment entitlements and compensation claims.

Determination of the Dispute

Participating in the consideration of submissions and tribunal deliberations.

Issuance of the Arbitral Award

Participating in an award that was subsequently upheld and ordered to be enforced.

Outcome of the Arbitration

The arbitral proceedings concluded with an award resolving the dispute concerning payment entitlements and financial compensation after review of the contract, supporting documents, technical observations, and the parties’ submissions.According to the supplied case information, the competent Commercial Court of Appeal in Riyadh subsequently upheld the arbitral award and ordered its enforcement.The award then proceeded to the enforcement stage before the Enforcement Court in Riyadh.The dispute therefore concluded with an arbitral award that was judicially upheld and placed into enforcement.

Legal Insight

In sewerage and infrastructure disputes, technical observations issued by the project owner may directly affect the assessment of completed works, contractual payment entitlements, and compensation claims.A financial claim or technical report should not be considered in isolation. Each claim must be linked to the contract, scope of works, execution records, and the relevant technical observations.The subsequent judicial decision upholding the arbitral award and ordering its enforcement also demonstrates the importance of procedural compliance and clear treatment of the claims within the arbitral award.

Legal Value Delivered to the Client

Resolved a dispute arising from a contract exceeding SAR 12 million.
Considered claims exceeding SAR 2.5 million.
Addressed technical observations relating to a major infrastructure project.
Distinguished contractual payment entitlements from compensation claims.
Evaluated competing documentary evidence submitted by both parties.
Participated in an award that was upheld and ordered to be enforced.

Legal Team Responsible for This Matter

Practice Areas Related to This Matter

Asset protection in a partnership and commercial franchise dispute, featuring a business development model, legal agreement, protective shield, scales of justice, and a judge’s gavel

Legal Representation to Protect Real Estate Assets in a Partnership and Commercial Franchise Dispute Exceeding SAR 7 Million in Al…

Case Study Legal Representation in a Real Estate Partnership and Franchise Dispute Exceeding SAR 7 Million in Al Jubail Dispute...

تسوية ودية في نزاع تعاقدي بين فرد وشركة مقاولات في السعودية

Contractual Dispute Settlement Closed Before SCCA | Atyar Law

Commercial Dispute – Contractual – Conciliation Contractual Dispute Individual & Company Contracting Sector Amicable Settlement Saudi Center for Commercial Arbitration...

Mediation and amicable settlement of a property rent dispute in Riyadh, featuring a handshake, legal agreement, scales of justice, and the city skyline

Mediation and Settlement of a Commercial Property Rent Dispute Involving a Real Estate Asset Exceeding SAR 1 Billion in Riyadh

Case Study Mediation and Settlement of a Commercial Property Rent Dispute Involving a Real Estate Asset Exceeding SAR 1 Billion...

Proof of ownership of real estate assets valued at SAR 1 billion in Qatif, featuring residential and commercial properties, ownership plans, scales of justice, and a judge’s gavel

Legal Representation in a SAR One Billion Real Estate Ownership Claim in Qatif

Case Study Legal Representation in a SAR 1 Billion Real Estate Ownership Claim in Qatif Dispute Value SAR 100,000,000 Claims...

Trademark symbol with medical products, a magnifying glass, scales of justice, and a judicial gavel, representing a legal review of a compensation claim arising from trademark imitation and commercial damages.

Legal Review and Action Plan for a Compensation Claim Exceeding SAR 10 Million Arising from Trademark Infringement and Medical Pro

Case Study Legal Review and Action Plan for a Compensation Claim Exceeding SAR 10 Million Arising from Trademark Infringement and...

Exit from an investment and commercial partnership in Madinah involving business activities and claims exceeding SAR 70 million, featuring legal documents, partnership separation elements, and electrical and lighting equipment.

Legal Representation in an Exit from an Investment Partnership Involving Business Activities and Claims Exceeding SAR 70 Million in Madinah

Case Study Dispute Value Legal Representation in Investment Partnership Exit & Claims – Madinah SAR 70M SAR 70,000,000 Exiting an...

Need Legal Support in Infrastructure or Sewerage Project Arbitration?

If you are involved in a dispute concerning a sewerage project, infrastructure works, a construction contract, or claims for payment and compensation, Atyar Advocates and Legal Consultants provides experience in arbitration, construction contracts, infrastructure disputes, claims analysis, and commercial dispute resolution.

جاهز لحماية حقوقك أو تطوير أعمالك؟

تواصل معنا اليوم واحصل على استشارة قانونية موثوقة

سواء كنت فردًا تبحث عن تمثيل قانوني موثوق أو شركة تحتاج إلى دعم قانوني متخصص، نحن في شركة أطيار للمحاماة والاستشارات القانونية جاهزون لمساعدتك. دعنا نكون شريكك القانوني في كل خطوة، بخبرة تتجاوز 23 عامًا في الأنظمة السعودية.

احجز استشارتك الآن

فرع الرياض

فرع الخبر

بيانات الاتصال

مجالات الممارسة

القانون التجاري والشركات

صياغة العقود والوثائق القانونية

القانون المالي والمصرفي

الضرائب والزكاة والجمارك

العقارات والملكية الخاصة