
Case Study Successful Defence in a Shareholder Exit, Rights Liquidation and Compensation Claim of Approximately SAR 2 Million Dispute Value...
Disputes arising from healthcare operation, maintenance, and management agreements may involve operational obligations, financial entitlements, compensation claims, and urgent applications.This dispute involved a dental healthcare entity and an operation and maintenance company under an agreement valued at approximately SAR 3 million, with claims below SAR 1 million.Prof. Dr. Turki bin Abdullah Al-Tayyar acted as the sole arbitrator, handling reciprocal financial and compensation claims within a highly compressed one-week arbitral timetable. The proceedings concluded with the issuance of an arbitral award within one week, which was subsequently approved and enforced by the competent courts.
Operation, maintenance, and management
Approximately SAR 3 million
Below SAR 1 million
Sole arbitration
One week
Arbitral award judicially approved and enforced
The dispute arose under an operation, maintenance, and management agreement for a dental medical facility, involving disagreements over financial entitlements and compensation claims between the parties.The matter also included urgent applications, detailed factual and contractual issues, and extensive documentary evidence, all of which had to be addressed within an exceptionally short one-week arbitral timetable.Acting as sole arbitrator, Prof. Dr. Turki bin Abdullah Al-Tayyar reviewed the agreement, reciprocal claims, evidence, and parties’ submissions before issuing the arbitral award.The award was subsequently approved by the competent Court of Appeal and enforced before the Enforcement Court in the Eastern Region.
O&M Agreement
Healthcare & Dentistry
Mutual Claims
Urgent applications
The matter concerned an arbitration arising from an operation, maintenance, and management agreement for a medical facility, involving reciprocal claims for financial entitlements and compensation, urgent applications, and a complex factual background that had to be resolved within one week.
The arbitration required focused issue management, evidence review, and efficient resolution of claims.
Determining the operational and management obligations allocated to each party.
Assessing the amounts claimed by each party under the contractual relationship.
Reviewing the contractual and factual basis of the reciprocal claims for compensation.
Considering claims advanced by each party against the other within the same arbitration.
Addressing matters requiring expedited consideration during the proceedings.
Weighing the documentary evidence relied upon by both parties.
The extremely short timetable required intensive procedural management while still allowing the dispute to be properly considered and determined.
Both parties asserted claims for financial entitlements and compensation against each other, requiring each claim to be independently assessed.
The existence of urgent requests added a significant procedural dimension and required immediate prioritisation.
The dispute arose from a lengthy and intricate course of dealings that had to be organised and linked to the relevant contractual obligations.
Each party possessed documentary evidence supporting its position, making evidentiary assessment central to the determination.
The dispute combined operational, management, contractual, and financial issues within a single arbitral framework.
The principal areas of dispute were defined early because of the exceptionally limited arbitral timeframe.
Urgent requests and issues capable of affecting the determination of the dispute were addressed first.
Each party’s financial and compensation claims were analysed independently before being considered against the opposing claims.
The lengthy factual history was organised chronologically and linked to the relevant contractual obligations.
The parties’ documents were evaluated objectively according to their relevance to the agreement and the claims in dispute.
The review, submissions, deliberation, and determination were managed efficiently to permit issuance of the award within one week.
Managing and determining the dispute as sole arbitrator.
Analysing the operation, maintenance, and management agreement.
Reviewing the parties’ reciprocal financial and compensation claims.
Addressing urgent matters submitted during the arbitration.
Reviewing the documentary record and the parties’ submissions.
Resolving the dispute within one week through an award that was subsequently approved and enforced.
Despite the complex factual history, reciprocal claims, urgent applications, and the exceptionally short one-week arbitral period, the dispute was reviewed and determined within the prescribed timeframe.The proceedings concluded with the issuance of an arbitral award resolving the dispute between the parties within one week.According to the case information, the competent Court of Appeal subsequently approved the award, which was then enforced before the Enforcement Court in the Eastern Region.The matter therefore progressed from a highly compressed arbitration to a final award that received judicial approval and enforcement.
Disputes arising from operation, maintenance, and management agreements often extend beyond simple payment claims because they may involve operational performance, management obligations, compensation, reciprocal claims, and continuation of the contractual relationship.Where both parties advance similar claims against one another, each claim must be considered independently by reference to its contractual basis and supporting evidence.A highly compressed arbitration timetable also requires disciplined case management, early identification of the key issues, and immediate prioritisation of urgent applications.

Founder and Managing Partner, and an expert in the judiciary, legal practice, arbitration, and university education, with more than 25 years of combined experience.

Partner specialising in administrative contracts, investment, and litigation, with extensive experience in administrative and commercial cases.

Case Study Successful Defence in a Shareholder Exit, Rights Liquidation and Compensation Claim of Approximately SAR 2 Million Dispute Value...

Case Study Final Judgment Confirming Ownership of a Fuel Station Property and Issuance of a Final Title Deed in Tathlith...

Case Study Recovery of Subcontract Payments and Release of Bank Guarantees Under a SAR 1 Million Contract Dispute Value SAR...
Criminal Litigation Case Study Criminal Litigation Intentional Homicide Qisas Riyadh Qisas Judgment in an Intentional Homicide Case After Criminal Responsibility...

Case Study Commercial Arbitration in an Infrastructure and Electrical Works Dispute in Jazan Under a Contract Exceeding SAR 5 Million...

Case Study Legal Advice, Litigation, and Settlement of a Share-Trading Investment Relationship Exceeding SAR 12 Million in Al-Ahsa Dispute Value...
If you are involved in a dispute arising from an operation, maintenance, or management agreement, a healthcare facility contract, or reciprocal claims for payment and compensation, Atyar Advocates and Legal Consultants provides experience in commercial arbitration, operation and maintenance agreements, contract analysis, and dispute resolution.
سواء كنت فردًا تبحث عن تمثيل قانوني موثوق أو شركة تحتاج إلى دعم قانوني متخصص، نحن في شركة أطيار للمحاماة والاستشارات القانونية جاهزون لمساعدتك. دعنا نكون شريكك القانوني في كل خطوة، بخبرة تتجاوز 23 عامًا في الأنظمة السعودية.
القانون التجاري والشركات
صياغة العقود والوثائق القانونية
القانون المالي والمصرفي
الضرائب والزكاة والجمارك
العقارات والملكية الخاصة
© 2025 All Right Reserved Al Tayyar Leagal company
WhatsApp us