
Case Study Drafting a Real Estate Investment and Development Agreement Exceeding SAR 800 Million in Makkah Dispute Value SAR 800...
Disputes involving property encroachment, construction on another’s land, and compensation for unauthorised use require careful analysis of ownership and property boundaries.In this matter, Atyar Advocates and Legal Consultants represented the client before the General Court in Makkah in a dispute involving encroachment and use of the client’s property for approximately three years, with compensation exceeding SAR 1 million.The case resulted in a ruling in favour of the client confirming the opposing party’s wrongful entry into the property.
Property encroachment and boundary overlap
More than SAR 1 million
Makkah
Approximately 3 years
Approximately two weeks
Judicial ruling confirming the opposing party’s encroachment onto the client’s property
The dispute arose after a neighbouring owner constructed within the boundaries of the client’s property in Makkah and used the affected portion for approximately three years.The client sought removal of the encroachment and compensation for unauthorised use. Atyar Advocates and Legal Consultants analysed the ownership, boundary, and occupation issues and prepared the legal memoranda submitted before the General Court in Makkah.The proceedings resulted in a ruling in favour of the client confirming the opposing party’s wrongful entry onto the property.
Private real estate
Property Encroachment
General Court in Makkah
Judicial confirmation of encroachment
The matter focused on establishing that part of the neighbouring construction extended into the client’s property, determining the legal consequences of that encroachment, and pursuing removal together with compensation for the period of unauthorised use.
The legal work included review of title documents, property boundaries, the location of the encroachment, the nature of the construction, and the duration of occupation.
Determining the precise extent of the client’s ownership and the area affected by the neighbouring construction.
Establishing that part of the neighbouring development crossed into the client’s land.
Assessing the legal effect of building within property owned by another party.
Considering the consequences of occupation and use continuing for approximately three years.
Seeking removal of the opposing party from the portion of land occupied without right.
Pursuing compensation for the period during which the property was occupied and used.
Approximately three years had passed since the construction, requiring careful analysis of whether the client’s delay affected the claim.
It was not straightforward to establish that the opposing party knowingly built within the client’s land from the outset.
The claim depended on accurately establishing the boundary line and demonstrating that the construction crossed into the client’s property.
The matter required treatment of both restoration of possession and compensation for past occupation.
The claim required consideration of the use and benefit obtained by the opposing party during the period of occupation.
The legal position had to rest on ownership, boundaries, and actual encroachment rather than relying solely on proof of bad faith.
The legal analysis began by confirming the scope of the client’s ownership and the relevant property boundaries.
The existing construction was linked to the property location in order to demonstrate that the neighbouring party had entered the client’s land.
The claim was structured around the objective fact of encroachment rather than making intentional misconduct the sole basis of liability.
The period before formal legal action was carefully analysed and placed within the broader legal context of the client’s continuing property rights.
The compensation claim was linked to the duration of occupation and the benefit derived from use of the affected portion of the property.
The relevant facts, documents, and legal grounds were organised into clear and structured memoranda before the court.
Assessing the client’s position and the available remedies for removal and compensation.
Reviewing the ownership, boundary, encroachment, and use issues.
Examining property title documents and evidence relating to the boundaries.
Preparing written submissions for filing before the court.
Developing the legal basis for compensation arising from occupation and use.
Handling the dispute before the General Court in Makkah.
The proceedings resulted in a judicial ruling in favour of the client by the General Court in Makkah.The judgment confirmed the opposing party’s wrongful entry onto the client’s property, thereby supporting the client’s legal position in relation to the property encroachment.The underlying claim also included removal of the encroachment and compensation for the period during which the affected portion of the property had been occupied and used.
In property encroachment disputes, protection of ownership rights does not depend solely on proving the opposing party’s bad faith.The central issues are usually ownership, the precise property boundaries, the existence of actual encroachment, and the benefit derived from occupying or using the affected land.Likewise, a delay in taking legal action does not automatically extinguish the owner’s rights, although the legal effect of that delay should be carefully assessed in the context of the particular facts.Accurate identification of the boundary line remains one of the most important elements in this type of dispute.
The matter involved property in Makkah where the owner of a neighbouring property constructed within part of the client’s land and continued using the affected area for approximately three years.
The legal work focused on establishing the encroachment, protecting the client’s ownership rights, and pursuing eviction and compensation.

Founder and Managing Partner, and an expert in the judiciary, legal practice, arbitration, and university education, with more than 25 years of combined experience.

Partner specialising in administrative contracts, investment, and litigation, with extensive experience in administrative and commercial cases.

Case Study Drafting a Real Estate Investment and Development Agreement Exceeding SAR 800 Million in Makkah Dispute Value SAR 800...

Case Study Legal Review of a USD 7 Million Liquidated Damages Claim Under a USD 4 Billion International Steel Supply...

Case Study Legal Review of a USD 200 Million Liquidated Damages Claim Under a USD 1.3 Billion International Steel Supply...

Case Study Real Estate Ownership Dispute Over SAR 2 Million and Validity of a Judicial Title Establishment Instrument in Al...

Case Study Petition for Reconsideration in an Administrative Dispute Concerning the Annual Performance Evaluation of a Government Employee Atyar Advocates...

Case Study Legal and Judicial Review of a USD 325 Million Liquidated Damages Claim Under an International Steel Supply Contract...
If you are involved in a dispute concerning real estate ownership, conflicting title deeds, property boundaries and areas, or the validity of a judicial title establishment instrument, Atyar Advocates and Legal Consultants provides legal studies, title-document review, assessment of legal position, and preparation of legal memoranda and defences.
سواء كنت فردًا تبحث عن تمثيل قانوني موثوق أو شركة تحتاج إلى دعم قانوني متخصص، نحن في شركة أطيار للمحاماة والاستشارات القانونية جاهزون لمساعدتك. دعنا نكون شريكك القانوني في كل خطوة، بخبرة تتجاوز 23 عامًا في الأنظمة السعودية.
القانون التجاري والشركات
صياغة العقود والوثائق القانونية
القانون المالي والمصرفي
الضرائب والزكاة والجمارك
العقارات والملكية الخاصة
© 2025 All Right Reserved Al Tayyar Leagal company
WhatsApp us