
Case Study Dispute Value Legal Representation in an Investment and Partnership Relationship for Share Trading Involving Business Activities Exceeding SAR...
A dispute arose between two construction companies under a subcontract and materials supply agreement for a waterfront development project in Yanbu, valued at over SAR 5 million, with claims exceeding SAR 2 million.A multi-member arbitral tribunal was constituted by the competent Commercial Court of Appeal, with Prof. Dr. Turki Al-Tayyar serving as a tribunal member.After approximately one year of proceedings, the dispute concluded with an amicable settlement between the parties within the arbitration framework.
Subcontracting and materials supply
More than SAR 5 million
More than SAR 2 million
Multi-member arbitral tribunal
Approximately one year
Dispute settled amicably within the arbitration proceedings
The dispute arose from a subcontract and materials supply agreement for a waterfront development project in Yanbu, involving dewatering works, payment entitlements, completed works, and supplied materials.An arbitral tribunal was constituted by the competent Commercial Court of Appeal in the Eastern Region, with Prof. Dr. Turki Al-Tayyar serving as a tribunal member and participating in the review of the parties’ submissions and evidence.The proceedings ultimately concluded with an amicable settlement between the parties within the arbitration process.
Subcontract and materials supply agreement
Yanbu
Dewatering, water-removal works, and materials supply
Settlement within arbitration
The matter concerned an arbitration arising from a subcontract and materials supply agreement for a waterfront development project, involving financial claims and competing documentary evidence submitted by both parties.
The arbitral process required review of the project scope, completed works, supplied materials, alleged contractual breaches, payment entitlements, and the evidentiary strength of each party’s case.
Determining the scope of works and obligations allocated to each party.
Reviewing the supply obligations, quantities, and associated payment entitlements.
Assessing the works performed and their conformity with the contractual requirements.
Analysing each party’s allegations of non-performance or defective performance.
Reviewing claims exceeding SAR 2 million and linking them to completed works and supplied materials.
Weighing the competing documents and evidence submitted by both parties.
Each party relied on documents and evidentiary materials supporting its own position, making comparative assessment of the evidence central to the dispute.
The matter involved subcontracted works, materials supply, and payment for execution, resulting in several interrelated obligations and claims.
The dispute involved dewatering and water-removal works within a waterfront development project, adding a technical dimension to the contractual analysis.
It was necessary to distinguish between works actually performed, amounts contractually due, and amounts disputed by the parties.
The dispute involved a party with an international connection, adding a cross-border dimension to the contractual and arbitral framework.
The proceedings required the tribunal to manage the dispute while preserving the possibility of a consensual resolution between the parties.
The process began with identifying the contractual obligations relating to subcontracting and supply.
Claims relating to executed works and supplied materials were assessed separately and matched with the relevant evidence.
The documents submitted by both parties were reviewed according to their relevance and evidentiary weight.
The technical works were analysed by reference to the contractual obligations governing them.
The submissions and evidence were considered within the framework of the duly constituted multi-member arbitral tribunal.
The arbitral process continued until the parties were able to conclude the dispute by settlement.
Serving as a member of a tribunal constituted pursuant to a judicial appointment decision.
Analysing the subcontract and materials supply arrangements.
Reviewing the documents supporting the parties’ competing claims and defences.
Assessing payment entitlements, work charges, and the value of supplied materials.
Participating in the review of submissions, defences, and the procedural conduct of the arbitration.
Contributing within the tribunal to a process that concluded with an amicable settlement.
The arbitration proceeded through review of the contract, project execution records, materials supply, financial claims, and the evidentiary submissions of both parties.According to the supplied case information, the arbitral tribunal successfully brought the dispute to an amicable settlement between the parties.The parties accepted the settlement reached within the arbitration process, thereby concluding a dispute arising from a contract valued at more than SAR 5 million and claims exceeding SAR 2 million.
Construction arbitrations become particularly complex where both parties present apparently strong documentary evidence supporting their respective positions.In such matters, the analysis should not be limited to the volume of documents. Each item of evidence should be assessed by reference to the contract, the scope of work, actual performance, and the specific financial claim in dispute.Arbitration also does not prevent the parties from reaching a settlement during the proceedings. A negotiated resolution can be an effective outcome where it follows a clear understanding of the parties’ legal positions and the risks of continuing the dispute.
The dispute concerned a subcontract and materials supply agreement for a waterfront development project in Yanbu, with claims relating to work charges, supplied materials, and alleged contractual breaches.
A multi-member arbitral tribunal was constituted to hear the matter, and the proceedings ultimately concluded through settlement.

Founder and Managing Partner, and an expert in the judiciary, legal practice, arbitration, and university education, with more than 25 years of combined experience.

Partner specialising in administrative contracts, investment, and litigation, with extensive experience in administrative and commercial cases.

Case Study Dispute Value Legal Representation in an Investment and Partnership Relationship for Share Trading Involving Business Activities Exceeding SAR...

Case Study Legal Representation in an Investment and Partnership Dispute Involving Hotel and Real Estate Tower Investments Exceeding SAR 300...

Case Study Legal Review of Sharia and Statutory Issues in a Lease Agreement Connected with an Estate Exceeding SAR 50...

Case Study Legal Review of a USD 4 Million Liquidated Damages Claim Under a USD 80 Million International Steel Supply...

Case Study Amicable Settlement of a SAR 9 Million Promissory Note Dispute and Cancellation of Enforcement Orders Against a Guarantor...

Case Study Legal Representation in a Commercial Franchise and Investment Partnership Dispute Exceeding SAR 4 Million in Riyadh Dispute Value...
If you are involved in a dispute concerning subcontracting, materials supply, infrastructure works, or a commercial agreement with an international element, Atyar Advocates and Legal Consultants provides experience in arbitration, construction disputes, contract analysis, claims review, and alternative dispute resolution.
سواء كنت فردًا تبحث عن تمثيل قانوني موثوق أو شركة تحتاج إلى دعم قانوني متخصص، نحن في شركة أطيار للمحاماة والاستشارات القانونية جاهزون لمساعدتك. دعنا نكون شريكك القانوني في كل خطوة، بخبرة تتجاوز 23 عامًا في الأنظمة السعودية.
القانون التجاري والشركات
صياغة العقود والوثائق القانونية
القانون المالي والمصرفي
الضرائب والزكاة والجمارك
العقارات والملكية الخاصة
© 2025 All Right Reserved Al Tayyar Leagal company
WhatsApp us